Does IBM Speak Open Source With A Forked Tongue?

But now with some open source companies looking to move into the lucrative mainframe software business, IBM is exerting its patents portfolio to balk the open source players. There accept been academic complaints filed with the European Commission and now some prominent open source community members are adage when it comes to open source IBM has gone back on its word.

The TurboHercules complaint is allegedly one of several before the EU regarding IBM right now. The Hercules association made a academic complaint to the EU about monopoly practices. Two of the patents asserted were specifically allotment of the 500 patents that IBM committed to not asserting adjoin open source software just a few years ago.

He is calling on the EU to take action and asking the free and open source software (FOSS) community to bring down their wrath on IBM. Florian Mueller, an open source advocate and architect of the NoSoftwarePatents campaign published a blog post today blasting IBM for going back on its chat and accusing the aggregation of supporting open source alone as continued as its own business interests are served.

First of all IBM is a very big company. Anzani in particular were not aware of what they were stepping into here. OK, so before we all go out and throw away all of the cool code that IBM and its employees accept contributed to several open source projects, lets all take a deep breath. They ability not accept realized that with all of the patents listed in their letter to Turbo Hercules, that two (of 162 in the letter) were on the do not enforce list. I can tell you from personal experience that the left hand doesn’t always know what the right hand is doing over there. It could be that the mainframe unit and Mr.

But beyond that actuality is another thought. Before they are going to let abeyant competitors into that market, of course they are going to try and grab the biggest piece of the pie for themselves. But the mainframe business is a 25 billion dollar business for IBM. That is an awful lot of money on the table. I can’t say I accusation them. Alone when they see that it will be more profitable to let others into the market will they do it. Don’t you anticipate it is naive to expect IBM to do anything adjoin their own best business interests? They are a for profit aggregation with shareholders to answer to. Yes they accept recognized that open source software affords them an opportunity to make even greater profits.


HP’s iPad-killer Slate PC Makes An Appearance

But this gizmo is something new. The world is full of people who formed fierce opinions about the iPad not only before they’d used one but before they knew annihilation for sure about it. In the end, you have to try it for yourself. And if you think you can come to any conclusions about it by cerebration of it as either a giant iPhone or a netbook with the keyboard chopped off, you’re wrong.

I was out the door with a unit in hand at 9:15am, and spent the blow of Saturday (and Sunday morning) with it in hand, exploring the built-in apps, downloading a gaggle of third-party ones, and generally trying to form more definitive impressions than I was able to get during my brief hands-on time with an iPad at January’s barrage event. I woke up at 5am on Saturday, drove to my neighborhood Apple Store, and ended up near the front of the queue of first-day iPad buyers.

I’m just activity to tell you eleven cogent things I know about the thing that I didn’t know-at least for sure-on Friday night. This isn’t a comprehensive review-I’m not activity to bemoan the abridgement of Flash, multitasking, and a camera, or repeat any impressions that you can come to after spending time by yourself with an iPad.

The basic interface is so abuse good, and the achievement is so zippy, that it disappears in your hands-to abduct a phrase from Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos that he’d probably prefer I didn’t apply to the iPad. We’ve called carriageable computers “notebooks” for a quarter century, but the iPad is the first one I’ve used that truly feels like a notebook. It really is a new type of device.

The iPad’s booklike form factor, beautiful screen, touch interface, instant-on ability, and general artlessness make me think it’s activity to be superb for reading Web pages, e-books, and digital magazines-at least if you stay out of absolute sunlight. Steve Jobs said that the iPad was “way better” than a netbook for browsing the Web, and if he was talking about the Web, he has a strong case. And even though we’ve read on computers (portable and otherwise) for decades, computers have never been very satisfactory reading devices.